Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1965

Abolition of The expiry Penalty1040 Words5 PagesThe Abolishment of the Death Penalty As Ameri evokes we live in a modern republic under a g overnment constructed to secure the rights of the people. Todays government and discriminatory systems were forged by our foot fathers as they fought to establish a government free from tyranny and barbarism and thereby forming a constitution base on civil liberties.Our verdant has g linen and matured through the centuries and in effect has made changes and alterations as innovations and advancements have deemed necessary. One argona where we seem to have evolved at a slower rate is in the archaic and often in servicemane judicial laws of the closing penalisation.The closing penalty, a law which strips the civil liberties and violates the human rights of the charge offender, charters to be abolished. If as a nation we are to save our integrity it is imperative that the unite States embrace the worldwide movement toward the flesh out abolition of the inhumane act of capital punishment.Intense controversy over the profoundity of the wipeout penalty in the United States has forever been multi-faceted and emotionally charged. Constitutional lawyers insist the founding fathers made provision for the shoemakers last penalty in the 5th amendment which guarantees referable process of law before a person can be deprived of emotional state, liberty or office, while ignoring the 8th amendment which bars cruel and unusual punishments (Singh, 2003).There is no constitutional amendment that gives state or federal governments the authority to proclaim death as a penalty. This is an assumption based on the methods of punishment apply in the era of the first colonies. The archaic eye for an eye, Annie plump your gun justice has regressed into a self-justifying realm of indecision where it is easier continue in conventional tradition.We direct to demand the legal system be held accountable to constitutional laws as written not as interpreted based on history. Death by hanging, firing squads, electrocution, the gas chamber and death by lethal injection are all options still operable to those on death row. Each one in progression a little more civilized then the one before it, or so society attempts to convince themselves.The courts, as well as society, need to stop accepting and allowing these grue several(prenominal) acts of purposely killing another human in the name of justice. In recent centuries the majority of American citizens support the death penalty believing it served both as a obstructor and as an appropriate response to particularly heinous crimes.Unquestionably, there are heinous acts of crime being committed. Yes, these crimes need to be addressed, victims and their families need governing body and offenders needed to be prosecuted, punished and kept from harming others. Yet, in our imperfect legal system and often overzealous prosecution mistakes are inevitable.Seemingly de finitive circumstantial evidence, coerced confessions, emotionally biased witness testimonies, inadequate legal prototype and community pressure all fatal ingredients that could lead to a life altering mistake by a jury of the accused peers or a presiding judge. It could be argued that death is what murderers deserve.However, requiring that the punishment fit the crime is an unsufferable principle, we would then have to apply this to all crimes such as rape, breach and torture. While punishment needs to be proportionate to the offense and avenging is sought, these are not sound and objective reasoning for the death penalty.Although some advocates for the death penalty would argue that its merits are worth the occasional deed of innocent people, to maintain the death penalty in the failures of the system is unsatisfactory (ACLU 2011). Eighty-four years ago, Judge Learned Hand said, Our procedure has been always haunted by the ghost of the innocent man convicted (Law Social Inq uiry, 2009).The account for a deterrent of violent crimes cannot be upheld consistently or statisti nominatey as a rational determinant. We need to stop allowing our legal system to play off of emotion and the human desire for retribution and bulge to ack without delayledge alternative sentencing such as life in prison house without parole. This is more humane as well as cost effective, due to less court appeal fees, separate housing and security costs, and the need for victim validation through life-long punishment is still fulfilled.The death penalty should no longer be a legal option. Once, unequivocally authentic worldwide for a variety of crimes, the death penalty has been widely prohibit in todays progressive society. The United Nations General Assembly imposed a policy that states throughout the world, it is desirable to progressively restrict the number of offenses for which the death penalty might be imposed, with a view to the desirability of abolishing this punishment .As of recent, 140 countries, more than two-thirds of the countries in the world have now abolished the death penalty in law or practice (Amnesty International, 2012). How can America remain influential in speaking with other nations active human rights and civil liberties while leading their own convicted citizens to death row? We need to step out of the hypocrisy and stand with these other countries worldwide and abolish the death penalty.Everyday American school children recite the compact of Allegiance in their classrooms repeating for liberty and justice for all. American junior(a) and senior high school students are being taught the history of the United States, the Constitution and Bill or Rights. They learn about civil liberties, American freedoms and the justice of the legal system. Yet, we are not providing them with examples when we continue to implement the death penalty.In an ever advancing country where liberal thinking and tolerance, equivalence and human rights a re encouraged by leaders, we still hold sporting to an archaic and unthinkable law, the death penalty. We need to hear the truth in the words of the framers of the constitution, the voice of the world and the cry of those who are appalled by the violation of human rights.The people of this free nation need, with one voice, to call for the abolition of the death penalty.ReferencesAmerican Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation, 2012, Retrieved March 9, 2012, http//www.aclu.org/capital-punishment/case-against-death-penaltyAmnesty International, 2012,Retrieved March 9, 2012, http//www.amnesty.org/en/death-penalty/abolitionist-and-retentionist-countriesLaw & Social Inquiry, Volume 34, Issue 3, 603633, summer 2009 Robert Singh, PhD, Governing America The regime of a Divided Democracy, 2003